STOP HISTORIC DESIGNATION!
Historic designation is government taking.
It is gross interference with your own property rights and unimaginable burdens.
Historic designation is government taking.
It is gross interference with your own property rights and unimaginable burdens.
New buildings create growth and jobs and increase your own property value. But 4 neighbors don't want to see their views obstructed. The unfairness of these proposed zoning changes is staggering. These neighbors prefers to see the blight and decay we already see...rather than support growth and economic development.
Directly from city report.
Historic preservation will make this much worse.
This is literally an example from the city's own reports of what should be preserved
You simply cannot appreciate just how abusive historic preservation is...without seeing how this pastor is subject to attack...his life's work. His church, his passion destroyed because preservation fanatics care more about buildings than any human considerations?
Two years later and it's only gotten much worse
The City of St. Petersburg produces this map detailing what would create an economic black hole.
The map is is misleading...because the burden extends out 200 feet from this new formal designation of historic assets.
Pursuant to City Code Section 16.70.040.1.4.D, a Site Plan Review (“SPR”) decision shall be guided by
more than 16 factors, described alternatively as criterion. Criterion No. 14 states:
“Sensitivity of the development to on-site and adjacent (within 200 feet) historic or
archaeological resources related to scale, mass, building materials, and other impacts.”
Please email your name and contact information so you can be advised.
(This video comes from the designation fight in 2021...the current 2023 fight is even worse.)
Please watch this video where the efforts to "quietly" impose historic designation are discussed at length. Note in particular the substantive discussions about how a vote of affected property owners is to be avoided....and instead city council members are placed into the adversarial role of prosecutors in these cases.
When an action of a governmental entity has inordinately burdened an existing use of property the property owner of that property is entitled to relief, which may include compensation for the actual loss to the fair market value of the real property caused by the action of government.
The Harris Act, enacted in 1995, created a new cause of action allowing property owners who suffer inordinate regulatory burdens to existing or reasonably foreseeable land uses to be compensated by the governmental entity creating the burden. § 70.001(1), (2), (5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2010).
How Much Money Does This Cost Homeowners?
Just how much should it cost you to change your own damn windows?
Bureaucrats will decide what roof you can change.
We've only recently ended significant and costly litigation in which property owners were forced to fight bitterly to preserve their own rights. And while the powder is hardly dry, open warfare has been announced yet again.
When public hearings on Ms. Dowling’s third-party application began in April, the Kings started receiving threatening and angry social-media posts. People started showing up at their home, asking to tour the property. “I wouldn’t wish this on my worst enemy,” said Mrs. King.
Historic designations also make it harder for property owners to develop their property for another use, such as higher-density housing or retail. In 2016, a historic preservation board in Seattle rejected a proposed apartment building because it didn’t match the heights of nearby buildings and thus would have altered the district’s historical character. Restrictions on redevelopment options mean less demand for a property which lowers property values.
Dan Schuh was a brilliant attorney. A man who had served his community selflessly for decades. His family long established in the community. None of that mattered when strangers decided that they should decide what happened to his dilapidated home.
The dispute dates back to 2014, after developer Nick Ekonomou became a backup buyer for the Mediterranean Revival-style building at 116 Fifth St. S, in the event Nestor’s contract fell through. Nestor had hoped to buy the building and convert it into a music museum and performance venue. He solicited donations thr
A horrendous example of the profoundly adverse impact designation has can be seen with this example. The church was slapped with the Scarlett D of Historic Designation, against their will. As a direct result, the church suffers a profound economic loss....and the property remains vacant and abandoned today. (Story Here)
Educate yourselves and make sure you understand just how devastating the historic preservation process can be to your own property rights!
Take a look here at the City of St. Pete Historical Preservation Page
(Pay attention to the Certificate of Appropriateness Application)
Sign up to hear from us about specials, sales, and events.
250 Mirror Lake Drive North, Saint Petersburg, Florida 33701, United States
PLEASE SHARE YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION